🚧 What did you do to your website today?

That’s so cool! Reminds me of a blog post by Sara Soueidan on her birds on a wire <hr>; dunno if you found it during your research, but imo it has some interesting insights re: accessibility and reader modes/apps.

4 Likes

That is a supercool way to show a book collection!

1 Like

hello it’s been a minute since i was here.two things i’ve done while in process of relocating while construction was going on in my building, I’m back now.

Two things i’ve done recently were creating an rss feed that combines all the other rss feeds from me,
https://piusbird.space/metafeed.php

and i’ve written a couple of posts on nightsong, my ā€œmoon blogā€ there is also a post forthcoming on my ā€œsun blogā€

6 Likes

I’m curious why, especially since you’re abandoning JSON Feeds (which I have not found the lack of support for you’ve cited and are so much easier to work with).

RSS only specifies pubDate. If I want to provide both the date the post was originally published and an update date, RSS doesn’t support that, but Atom does. I’ve been getting around this by using modified date instead of created date and appending both dates as a footer to each post along with contact details, but I’ve had people asking why posts originally written in 2021 are showing up as if I had published them last week.

Admittedly, JSON feeds support both creation and modified dates, but I don’t find JSON easier to work with than XML, especially when writing shell scripts. As for compability, Elfeed for Emacs doesn’t support JSON feeds. As far as I know, neither does newsboat. This might not matter to you, but it matters to me.

I’ve never seen either of those readers. Interestingly, I basically have never found Atom in the wild. That said, RSS 2.0 has the ability to add custom attributes via namespaces for things like modified date.

made https://њњњ.рина.орг/ completely new layout/design :D
p.s. please hard reset ur cache if uve been here before

4 Likes

Your layout is really comforting. I like the life loading gif on the right <3 and the photo gallery is my fav page

1 Like

Very cute! :meow_heart1:

I don’t know why, or if anything can be done about it, but I can’t view your page on mobile. (iPhone, Firefox) I get ā€œtoo many http redirectionsā€/ ā€œload cannot follow more than 20 redirectionsā€. I do not know what that even means, but thought I’d mention it. On my laptop everything works wonderfully.

1 Like

Kind of a small update, but I added a few words about my personal beliefs here: https://nosycat.codeberg.page/ – had them written down for years, really, but never had a good place to put them online before. Then again that’s one thing I like about making websites: sometimes the very shape of text on a page suggests what to put there.

5 Likes

Migrated my Mass Effect Legendary Edition mod list from Google Docs to my website. By doing this, I have finally moved all my public video game mod lists to my website. :meow_cheer:

4 Likes

thank you!

it loads properly on android firefox. i have no means of testing for an iphone so im not sure how to even fix that

3 Likes

I don’t even know if this is something you could fix. Maybe someone who knows more about these kinds of things will read this and can enlighten us. Until then I do what you suggest on your site, and view it on my laptop. :slightly_smiling_face:

I enjoyed reading your beliefs. Would you mind giving a bit more color to your thoughts about HTML? In particular this block:

I once described HTML5 as an admission by manufacturers that major browsers never truly implemented the previous 4.0 standard. That’s a bad thing; as a friend pointed out, web standards are now dictated by Google, and we’re even worse off (in this regard) than two decades ago before Firefox came out.

I get the part about Google influencing W3C and driving standards; I’m more curious about your note on HTML 4 and how we’re worse off today versus twenty years ago.

Context: I was very leaned into web development in the mid-90s up through around 2004. Coming back after a twenty year gap, everything seems like magic comparatively. I get that a big part of that is the reality that Chromium underpins like 90% of available browsers out there (along with the whole WebKit → Chromium split, i.e. ā€œcross-browser compatibilityā€ is less of an issue comparatively today because of this). Curious if you can add more to your note. If not, all good.

I mean Google has been a lot more powerful for the past decade than MS ever was when IE6 had a quasi-monopoly on the browser market. That has far-reaching consequences.

I guess I was hoping for something a bit more concrete about what explicitly has made the web ecosystem worse (specifically about technology other than cookies/fingerprinting as clearly Google and the ad ecosystem has affected the web). I’m not here to debate whether Google is dominant (IMO it clearly has been) or that ad tech has had far-reaching impacts to user experience (it definitely has).

I’m wondering what specifically has died on the vine because of Google’s influence or been made worse when it comes to HTML and related standards. It’s just hard for me to look at the web tech available today, compare it to what was available 20 years ago, and think ā€œit’s worse today.ā€ All good, I can do my own research.

EDIT: Oh and btw, if I’m incorrectly reading into your comment, please feel free to disregard. If you’re just referring to the web ā€œexperienceā€ being worse today, I get that.

1 Like

We’ll never know. That’s the whole damn point.

1 Like

Gotcha. Thanks for replying.

my website is unironically made with html4 xD

2 Likes

Yes, you’re right. Thanks for reminding me.